Arbitration in business law is similar to mediation as a form of alternative resolution. They both seek to resolve disputes without going through the court proceedings of litigation. This also involves a neutral third party known as the arbitrator.
The difference between an arbitrator and a mediator is that the arbitrator makes the final decision. Mediators only try to help both parties agree, whereas arbitrators act as the court on the final decisions.
If you don’t agree with the arbitrator’s decision, you can choose not to agree to their decision depending on your arbitration contract. Some arbitration contracts do have clauses for binding decisions. This usually means you must go through a court proceeding. There, you will present similar arguments as you did in arbitration if you disagree.
Like mediation, arbitration also benefits from:
- Autonomy: Arbitrators act like a court, but you can choose who the arbitrator is and have a say in decisions. A business cannot choose who will be the judge in their case.
- Confidentiality: Privacy is always important when a business’s operations and trade secrets are at risk.
- Enforcement: If your arbitration agreement does not let either party challenge the arbitrator’s decision, that decision is final. This form of alternative resolution is a binding decision and is backed by Saudi Law.